Accessibility Business Case
WAI Education & Outreach Working Group
Why web accessibility?
Web is ubiquitous
Increasingly used for service delivery
Benefits many people
Benefits your organisation
Auxiliary Benefits (2002)
Increased market share
Improved efficiency
Technical benefits
http://www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/benefits.html
WAI Business Case (2005)
Four Factors
Social
Technical
Financial
Legal and Policy
www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/
Social Factors
Essential for Equal Opportunity
Many barriers to Web use
Overlap with digital divide issues
Aspect of Corporate Social Responsibility
Benefits people with/without disabilities
Older people
Low literacy and NESB
Low bandwidth and old equipment
New and infrequent users
Beneficiaries
In addition to people with disabilities:
People using PDAs, web phones etc
People with poor communications infrastructure
People with old equipment
People working in restricted access environments
People with temporary impairments
People coping with environmental distractions
Older people
New users
Beneficiaries quantified
Some statistics
20% of Australians have an ongoing disability
9% of Australians are colour blind
17% of Australians have a print disability
30% of rural Australians browse with graphics off
10% of users have no JavaScript
Beneficiaries Microsoft Research
60% of US working age (18-64 year olds) are likely to benefit from the use of assistive technology
Due to difficulties with daily tasks or employment or an identified impairment
Computer users (18-64 year olds)
57% of 18-64 year-old computer users in USA are likely to benefit
44% of computer users use built-in accessibility options
17% computer users use assistive technology products
Implication: Accessible design is a mainstream issue
Source: Forrester Research 2003
(www.microsoft.com/enable/research/phase2.aspx)
Technical Factors
Site development and maintenance
Server load & bandwidth
Interoperability & device independence
Prepared for advanced technologies
High quality website
Standards Benefits - References
www.alistapart.com/articles/slashdot/
http://webstandardsgroup.org/
resources/index.cfm?resource_id=317
www.maccaws.org/kit/way-forward/
Web Standards Organisations
www.webstandardsgroup.org
www.webstandards.org
Fairfax Experience
Fairfax Digital (40 websites). SMH/Age alone have:
135 million page impressions per month
6 million unique visitors per month
3-4 minute average user session
Began moving to standards-based CSS/XHTML in Nov. 2003
Saved $1 million in bandwidth charges in a year
Source: Brett Jackson, Director Creative Services, Fairfax Digital, Web Standards Group Meeting, Melbourne 26 October 2004
Financial Factors
Increased website usage:
Potential use by more people
Better findability (SEO)
Usable in more situations
Better usability
Positive image for organisation
Direct cost savings
Cost considerations
Ongoing costs
Decreasing costs
Cost considerations
Initial costs
Acquiring expertise
Incorporating accessibility into procedures
Purchasing tools and technologies
Ongoing costs
Increased development time
Additional testing time
Decreasing costs
Incorporate accessibility from the start
Specialised organisation-wide resources
Legal and Policy Factors
Determining applicable policies
Consideration for different types of organisations
Considerations beyond requirements
Considerations for the future
Understanding risks for non-compliance
Addressing multiple standards
Australian situation
Australia
DDA 1992
Disability Standards Education, Transport
HREOC WWW notes
McGuire vs SOCOG
Online Council of Ministers
Commonwealth and State policies & guidelines
Australian Bankers Association standards
Organisational policy or Disability Action Plan
http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/info.aspx?page=639
International Policies
http://www.w3.org/WAI/Policy/Overview.html
Discussion
Presented by Andrew Arch
Vision Australia Accessible Information Solutions
With Support from:
Helle Bjarnø (Videncenter for Synshandicap - Denmark)
Shawn Lawton Henry (W3C WAI)